home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Offline 2 / NetNews Offline Volume 2.iso / news / comp / sys / amiga / misc-part1 / 4533 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1996-08-05  |  1.8 KB

  1. Path: pip.shsu.edu!usenet
  2. From: vis_cah@shsu.edu
  3. Newsgroups: alt.2600,comp.infosystems.www.browsers.ms-windows,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.setup,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.p
  4. Subject: Re: I will NEVER buy Windows 95 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  :-(
  5. Date: 7 Feb 1996 04:02:46 GMT
  6. Organization: Sam Houston State University
  7. Message-ID: <4f9896$2b0@pip.shsu.edu>
  8. Reply-To: vis_cah@shsu.edu
  9. NNTP-Posting-Host: xdial1-slip12.shsu.edu
  10. X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.09
  11.  
  12. In, Eric Salmassy <antelope@teleport.com> writes:
  13. >Subject: Re: I will NEVER buy Windows 95 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  :-(
  14. >Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 11:05:48 -0800
  15. >Message-ID: <3113B20C.AAD@teleport.com>
  16. >References: <4d9iri$7n0@news.mcn.net> <17718110C7S86.TPICCIAN@mu3.millersv.edu> <N.013096.165943.31@DeathStar.vvm.com> <4eo4na$6ve@news.nstn.ca> <N.013196.203805.30@DeathStar.vvm.com> <4eqc9p$51q@news.pacifier.com> <3112ca68.33483677@news.metronet.com>
  17. >
  18. >David Corn wrote:
  19. >> 
  20. >> On 1 Feb 1996 12:39:20 GMT, Todd Homi <cybernot@pacifier.com> wrote:
  21. >> 
  22. >> >spreadsheets,and  accounts apps. (by the way Peachtree 3.0 won't work
  23. >> >with 95) That cuts me out of the 95 market right there. I want programs
  24. >> >that work. For the new user Win95 might be OK, but I am not willing to
  25. >> >purchase all new software.
  26. >> 
  27. >> What happens with PT3.0, and what does the publisher say about the
  28. >> problem?
  29. >Peachtree will upgrade 3.0 to 3.5 which does work with Win95 for only
  30. >a $9.95 shipping fee - disks or CD-ROM.  I haven't run into any other
  31. >Windows apps that I use that don't work under '95.  Windows 3.X has
  32. >so many shortcomings that I couldn't stay with it.
  33.  
  34. But if you ran OS/2 you wouldn't HAVE to upgrade in the first place.....
  35.  
  36.